The UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants will hear the findings of the MEDMIG research project on Tuesday 20th September. The project has identified the reasons as to why refugees and migrants left their home countries to make the dangerous journey across the Mediterranean in 2015. It is one of the largest studies of its kind.
As part of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)-funded ‘Unravelling the Mediterranean Migration Crisis’ (MEDMIG) project, researchers interviewed 500 refugees and migrants about their experiences. Over three months when the number of arrivals were at their peak, the researchers spoke to people who had arrived on the shores of Greece via the Eastern Mediterranean Route from Turkey, as well those who had crossed into Europe using the Central Mediterranean Route from Libya in North Africa. Their findings on these two routes will be discussed at the UN Summit in New York on Tuesday.
Their results of the study highlight:
- Eighty-eight per cent of those arriving in Greece via the Eastern Mediterranean route said that they left their homes because of persecution, violence, death threats or human rights abuse.
- Of this group, more than a quarter said the ‘Islamic State’ group (IS) played a significant part in their decision to leave, with many being detained, tortured or forced to watch beheadings.
- Sixty-six per cent of those arriving in Italy mentioned factors that could be described as ‘forced migration’ including violence, death threats and religious persecution. Those from West and East Africa most commonly left because of the threat posed by militia groups and terrorist organisations or indefinite forced conscription in Eritrea.
- Over 75 per cent of those who crossed via Libya experienced physical violence, and over a quarter spoke of experiences related to the death of fellow travellers.
Although the arrival of refugees and migrants across the Mediterranean during 2015 was often presented as a single, uninterrupted movement of people to Europe – often using graphics depicting arrows from North Africa and the Middle East into Greece and Italy – the researchers found that these stories and images of ‘mass movement’ into Europe conceal a much more complex picture.
“The vast majority of refugees and migrants who are on the move remain in their own countries and regions of origin. Those who came to Europe in 2015 did so principally because they had been driven from their homes and found it impossible to rebuild their lives elsewhere”, says Professor Heaven Crawley from Coventry University, leader of the MEDMIG project.
“People told us that they left their countries because the violence had become intolerable and they feared for their safety and that of their families. These included a large number of Syrians, subject to almost daily barrel bombings, sniper fire and other attacks.”
Researchers also interviewed refugees and migrants who had arrived in Italy having made the perilous journey across the Mediterranean Sea from Libya and North Africa. Despite the frequent portrayal of people making this journey as ‘economic migrants’, only 38 per cent cited economic factors as a reason for leaving their home country.
There was often an overlap between forced and other forms of migration. Many interviewees said their ability to earn money and provide for their families had been curtailed due to conflict, violence and political persecution. They had often started their journey months or even years before, eventually travelling to Libya, attracted by the opportunities for work in the oil and construction sectors. Many felt that they had no choice other than to move to Europe due to the escalating violence in Libya since 2014.
“The migration flow across the Central Mediterranean route is diverse in many ways. The experiences of refugees and migrants vary, but what is common for most of them is that journeys are getting longer and sea crossings are more dangerous. Journeys are often marked by violence and exploitation, especially in Libya,” says Dr Nando Sigona from the University of Birmingham, co-author of the report on the Central Mediterranean route.
“Over 75 per cent of the people we spoke to who had crossed Libya explicitly referred to experiences of physical violence. Over a quarter spoke of experiences related to death in some way. The sea journey was considered to be the only way out of Libya: those boarding the boats did not think that there was any other way of escaping”.
The researchers also found that increased migration across the Mediterranean was closely associated with difficulties in securing access to protection or work, due to newly introduced visas as well as cascading border closures in the countries people had previously travelled to. As a consequence, refugees and migrants were channelled towards Turkey and Libya – where they often could not secure a status or livelihood – and often had no choice other than to use smugglers to get out of these countries and find safety elsewhere.
“Our research has found that smugglers are a more complex phenomenon than typically assumed,” says Dr Franck Düvell, based at the University of Oxford’s Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS) and co-author of the report on the Eastern Mediterranean Route.
“Whilst they profit from, and often exploit, the needs of refugees and migrants, they are also often the only ones who help people escaping war, terror or persecution. They can only thrive due to the absence of alternative legal migration channels. And whether we like it or not, often smugglers are an essential part of the journey.”
The final report of the MEDMIG project will be launched in Brussels on 3 November.